Division Links

Integrated Report Archives

Click on the report year of interest to expand the menu and access report documents, public comments and correspondence, and data files.

2022

2016

Public Hearing

  • Public Hearing Fact Sheet on the Draft 2016 Integrated Report
  • Public Hearing Officer Statement
  • DWQ Staff Statement
  • Audio recording from the July 19th public hearing

Report Chapters

  • EPA Action Letter
  • Utah’s Final Submission Letter to EPA
  • Full Print Ready Report
  • Report Title Page
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    Introduction to the Integrated Report (IR) Program.
  • Chapter 2: Assessment Methods
  • Chapter 3: Rivers and Stream Assessments
    List of supporting and impaired rivers and streams, including waters with a TMDL priority. The above PDF includes all Watershed Management Units (WMU).
  • All River and Stream Assessments
  • Chapter 4: Lakes and Reservoirs Assessments
    All Lakes and Reservoir Assessments Excel file 
  • Chapter 5: Narrative Standard Assessment of Recreational Use Support in Lakes and Reservoirs and Application to Utah Lake
  • Chapter 6: Evaluation of Harmful Algal Bloom Data in Farmington Bay, Great Salt Lake (
  • Chapter 7: Utah’s Draft Assessment Methods for High Frequency Data and Pilot: Application for the Jordan River Case Study
    Summary of proposed assessment methods for analyzing high frequency dissolved oxygen data with a focus on the Jordan River.
  • 303(d) Vision and 5-alt Categories

Supplemental Information

Report Public Comment

  • DWQ’s Response to Public Comments from the 2016 Draft Integrated Report

List of individual comments received on the 2016 Draft Integrated Report public comment period from June 10th, 2016 and 5:00 p.m. on September 8, 2016:

  • DWQ Public Hearing: 07192016
  • EPA, Region 8: 08092016
  • A. L. Meyers: 07252016
  • B. M. Holden: 07292016
  • C. M. DeVries
  • D. D. Erley and A. Hulquist
  • E. R. Dubuc: 09082016 (3
  • F. T. Holstrom and P. Heck: 09122016
  • G. T. Miller   | Data File
  • H. D. Decker, et al.
  • I. R. Mickelsen: 09082016
  • J. J. Stewart: 09082016
  • K. L. Adams: 09202016
  • L. M. Hodgesett
  • M. M. Rau
  • N. L. Rawlings| Data
  • O. T. Bosteels: 09082016
  • P. S. Austin: 09092016
  • Q. J. Adams: 08312016
  • R. D. Richards: 08282016
  • S. S. Cannon: 08262016
  • T. D. Sewell, et al.
  • U. D. Wayment: 09072016
  • V. M. Allen: 07302016
  • W. J. Geertsen: 07302016
  • X. S. Hatch: 07302016
  • Y. J. Judd: 08082016
  • Z1. D. Potts: 09062016
  • Z2. E. Sorensen: 08022016
  • Z3. T. Frates: 08092016

Assessment Methods Public Comment

  • A_TMiller
  • B_JRatner
  • C_BShakespeare
  • DWQ’s Response to Comments on the Draft 2016 303(d) Assessment Methodology

2012-2014

Report Documents

  • EPA Action Letter
  • EPA Action Letter Appendix
  • Utah’s Final Submission Letter to EPA
  • Chapter 1: IntroductionI
    ntroduction to the Integrated Report (IR) Program, including an executive summary and details of what is new in the 2012/14 IR.
    • Map of Assessment Results: Statewide
    • Map of Assessment Results: Bear River
    • Map of Assessment Results: Cedar/Beaver
    • Map of Assessment Results: Colorado River Southeast
    • Map of Assessment Results: Colorado River West
    • Map of Assessment Results: Jordan River/Utah Lake
    • Map of Assessment Results: Lower Colorado River
    • Map of Assessment Results: Sevier River
    • Map of Assessment Results: Uinta Basin
    • Map of Assessment Results: Weber River
    • Map of Assessment Results: West Desert/Columbia
  • Chapter 2: Assessment Methods
    Description of 303(d) methodology for assessing rivers, stream, and lakes.
  • Chapter 3: Statewide Statistical Survey: Rivers and Lakes
    A Statewide Statistical Analysis for rivers and lakes highlighting the overall condition of Utah’s waters.
  • Chapter 4: Statewide Assessment: Wetlands | Appendix 1 | Appendix 2
    305(b) component of the IR for impounded wetlands.
  • Chapter 5: Rivers and Stream Assessments
    List of impaired and fully supporting rivers and streams, including waters with insufficient data and TMDL priority.
    All River and Stream Assessments Excel file that include worksheets with the following information:
    • Assessment Summaries: Rivers and Streams
    • 305(b) List Only: Rivers and Streams
    • 303(d) List Only: Rivers and Streams | Delisting Table
    • Approved TMDL List: Rivers and Streams | Approved TMDL/ Category 4A Only Assessments: Rivers and Streams
    • Category 4C Only Assessments: Rivers and Streams
  • Chapter 6: 303(d) List: Lakes and Reservoirs
    List of impaired and fully supporting lakes and reservoirs, including waters impaired due to fish consumption advisories. All Lakes and Reservoirs Assessments Files that include worksheets with the following information:
    • 305(b) List Only: Lakes and Reservoirs
  • Chapter 7: Great Salt Lake | Appendix
  • Geographical and Assessment Information about Sample Sites
  • River and Stream Data Files
    Assessment Summary and Data Files by parameter.
  • Lakes and Reservoirs Data Files
    Available upon Request. (Please refer to the contact information below).
  • Standards Used for the 2012-2014 Report
  • DWQ’s Response to Public Comments from the May 2012-2014 Draft Report

List of individual comments received on the May 2012-2014 Draft Integrated Report public comment period from May 30th 2014 through July 14th 2014:

  1. 07012014 C. Purcell
  2. 07092014 J. Ratner
  3. 07102014 L. Meyers
  4. 07102014 L. Newell
  5. 07102014 T. Miller
  6. 07112014 D. Richards v 1.3
  7. 07112014 D. Richards v 1.4
  8. 07112014 K. Cannon
  9. 07142014 GSLBSC
  10. 07142014 H. Hoven
  11. 07142014 J. Salt
  12. 07142014 R. Hotze
    • 07142014 S. Bloch
    • Attachment 1 WTP Record of Decision
    • Attachment 2 GNB ROD Appendix C
  13. 07142014 S. Schlanger
  14. 07142014 S. Spence
  15. Chapter 4 Statewide Assessment Wetlands Richards Comments
  16. Chapter 4 Statewide Assessment Wetlands with Miller Comments
  17. State IR Wetlands Appendix 2 Richards Comments

08012014L.Newell | Appendix

List of individual comments received on the October 2012-2014 Draft Integrated Report public comment period from October 3, 2014 through October 20, 2014:

  1. 10202014 L. Newell | DWQ’s Response
  2. 10XX2014 J. Ratner | DWQ’s Response

Summary Report Descriptions

Information on the column headers found in the Parameter Assessment Summary Reports.

  • Download the descriptions

Compiled Assessment File

A flat file that summarizes all of the parameter assessment reports below. In this file users can see the assessment category assigned to a parameter at a single sampling location, the assessment category assigned to a monitoring location (when there are multiple parameters assessed at a location), and the assessment category assigned to an assessment unit (when there are multiple monitoring locations assessed within a single assessment unit).

  • Download the Assessment File

Assessment Summary Reports and Data Files by Parameter

The files below contain the data and summary report of Assessment results by parameter and beneficial use.

  • Aluminum
  • Ammonia
  • Antimony
  • Arsenic
  • Barium
  • Biological Oxygen Demand
    All beneficial uses were assessed as pollution indicators.
  • Boron
  • Cadmium
  • Chromium
  • Copper
  • Dissolved Oxygen (DO) | DO for Sample Sites with Site Specific Criteria
  • E.coli  | Benthic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments (OE Scores)
    Only Assessment Summary Reports are provided for E. coli O/E Scores. For the E. coli data files contact Ellen Bailey ([email protected]). For the Benthic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment data files contact Ben Holcomb ([email protected]).
  • Fluoride
  • Hydrogen Sulfide
  • Iron
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Nickel
  • Nitrate
    All uses were assessed as pollution indicators with the exception of sample sites with 1C beneficial uses (e.g., waters that are protected for domestic purposes with prior treatment by treatment processes as required by the Utah Division of Drinking Water)
  • pH
  • Phosphorus
    All beneficial uses were assessed as pollution indicators.
  • Selenium
  • Silver
  • Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)| TDS for Sample Sites with Site Specific Criteria | Sulfate for Sample Sites with Site Specific Criteria
  • Temperature
  • Thallium
  • Zinc

2010

USEPA approved Utah’s 2010 Integrated Report on February 10, 2012 but deferred actions on Great Salt Lake and Kanab Creek-2. The final 303(d) list of impaired waters requiring a TMDL and delisted waters are presented as Part 3. Until the 305(b) portion of the Integrated Report (Part 2) is updated to match the final listings approved by USEPA, the tables in Part 3 should be consulted to determine the specific listing status of any waters.

  • USEPA Letter of Approval for 2008 and 2010 Integrated Report (02/10/12)

Part 1: Assessment Methods

  • Download the report

Part 2: Assessment Results

  • All Chapters Combined
  • Chapter 1: Statewide Overview and Table of Contents
  • Chapter 2: Overview of DWQ Water Quality Programs
  • Chapter 3: Statewide Water Quality Assessment
  • Chapter 4: Bear River Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 5: Weber River Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 6: Utah Lake-Jordan River Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 7: Uinta Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 8: Sevier River Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 9: Cedar/Beaver Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 10: Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 11: Colorado River West Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 12: Colorado River Southeast Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 13: Great Salt Lake and West Desert Watershed Management Unit
    • Supplemental Map Only
  • Chapter 14: Great Salt Lake
  • Appendix A-1 Part 1: Draft Great Salt Lake Assessment for Mercury 2010 Status of Scoping-Level Assessment
  • Appendix A-2 Part 2: Draft Great Salt Lake Assessment for Mercury 2010 Ecological Risk Assessment Approach
  • Appendix B-1: Comment Responses

Part 3: USEPA Approved 2010 303(d) List

  • Download the list
  • USEPA 2010 Approved Removal from 303(d) List
  • USEPA Follow-up Action Letter for Kanab Creek (04/11/12)

Comments Received on the October 2010 version 2008 and 2010 Integrated Reports

  • EPA Comments
  • Western Resource Advocates Comments

2008

USEPA approved Utah’s 2008 Integrated Report on February 10, 2012 but deferred actions on Great Salt Lake and Kanab Creek-2. The final 303(d) list of impaired waters requiring a TMDL and delisted waters are presented as Part 3. Until the 305(b) portion of the Integrated Report (Part 2) is updated to match the final listings approved by USEPA, the tables in Part 3 should be consulted to determine the specific listing status of any waters.

Part 1: Assessment Methods

  • Water Quality Assessment Guidance (10/07/10)
  • Appendix—Great Salt Lake Assessment Plan

Part 2: Assessment Results (305(b) Report

  • Chapters 2.4 through 2.13 combined

Individual downloads

  • Table of Contents
  • Chapter 2.1: Executive Summary
  • Chapter 2.2: Program Overview
  • Chapter 2.3: Statewide River and Stream Water Quality Assessment
  • Chapter 2.4: Bear River Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.5: Weber River Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.6: Utah Lake-Jordan River Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.7: Uinta Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.8: Sevier River Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.9: Cedar/Beaver Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.10: Lower Colorado River Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.11: Colorado River West Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.12: Colorado River Southeast Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.13: Great Basin Watershed Management Unit
  • Chapter 2.14: Lake Water Quality Assessment
  • Chapter 2.15: Biological Assessment Results
  • Chapter 2.16: Assessment Units with Elevated Levels of Phosphorus
  • Appendix A Comments and Responses

Part 3: USEPA Approved 2008 303(d) List

  • Download the list
  • USEPA 2008 Approved Removal from 303(d) List

2006

  • Utah’s 2006 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report to Congress
  • Utah’s EPA Approved Year 2006 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies

2004

  • Utah’s EPA Approved 2004 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report to Congress
  • Utah’s EPA Approved Year 2004 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies
  • 2004 Cedar-Beaver Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2004 Lower Colorado River Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2004 Sevier River Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2004 Southeast Colorado River Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2004 Uintah Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2004 West Colorado River Watershed Water Quality Assessment Fact Sheet
  • 2001 Bear River Watershed Management Unit Water Quality Assessment Report
    • Summary Fact Sheet
  • 2002 Utah Lake-Jordan River Water Quality Assessment
  • 2000 Weber River Watershed Management Unit Water Quality Assessment Report
  • Summary Fact Sheet

Last Updated:

Categories:

Back to top